Last updated: January 2026
This document discloses the sources behind reference material shown on ConstrCalc® — guides, standard quantities, country practices, glossary. It does not disclose sources for user-supplied data, because user-supplied data has no source but the user.
Where our guides mention a code or standard, the authoritative text is published by the body responsible for it — not by us. The organisations below maintain the standards our reference material points to. Always confirm the edition that applies in your jurisdiction, as codes are revised and local amendments frequently override national defaults.
These links are provided for verification and further reading. ConstrCalc has no commercial relationship with any of these organisations.
If you find a factual error in any of our reference material, please contact us. Substantive corrections are published with a dated note on the affected page.
All reference material is informational. For real-project decisions, consult a licensed professional in your jurisdiction. See our Disclaimer.
A reference figure without a stated origin is an assertion. Publishing where each baseline comes from, what construction type it assumes, and where it stops being applicable lets you judge whether it fits your project rather than trusting it blindly.
It also makes the platform correctable. When an estimator working in a market we know less well tells us a retention convention or a consumption baseline does not match local practice, having the original basis on record means the correction can be assessed properly and published with a dated note.
Treat published baselines as a sanity check, not as a bill of quantities. They are calibrated to conventional reinforced-concrete residential construction and will diverge sharply for timber framing, steel framing, or unusual specifications.
Once working drawings exist, a measured take-off supersedes any published average. The practical rule most estimators settle on is to use standards to validate and measured quantities to commit — and when the two disagree, the drawings win.
If a published baseline does not match practice in your market, tell us at info@constrcalc.com. Include the figure, the market you are working in, and the basis for your own number if you can. Corrections of this kind are reviewed against the original basis, and where the challenge holds they are published with a dated note on the affected page. Feedback from practitioners has improved this reference material before and remains the most reliable way we learn about regional divergence.